Picture I took of Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer in 2000 in Utrecht, Holland
{{{id=0| /// }}}A nonsingular plane algebraic curve is the set of solutions to a (nonsingular) polynomial:
$$F(X,Y) = 0$$
A rational point is $(x,y) \in \mathbf{Q}\times\mathbf{Q}$ such that $F(x,y) = 0$.
Ancient Problem: Find all solutions $x,y\in\mathbf{Q}$ to the equation $x^2 + y^2 = 1$. Equivalently, by clearing denominators, find all Pythagorean triples $(a,b,c)$ such that $a^2+b^2 = c^2$. This problem goes back thousands of years!
There is a nice construction that completely solves this problem. Just draw a line of rational slope through (-1,0) and find the unique other point of intersection with the circle. It will have to be rational, as you can verify with some algebra. Moreover, this gives every point! If $(x,y)$ is any rational solution, then the line through $(-1,0)$ and $(x,y)$ has rational slope $\frac{y}{x+1}$, so we would find it via the above process.
|
Definition: An integer $n$ is a congruent number if $n$ is the area of a right triangle with rational side lengths.
Major Unsolved Problem in Mathematics: Give an algorithm to decide whether or not an integer $n$ is a congruent number.
This is a 1000-year old open problem; it may be the oldest open problem in mathematics.
{{{id=39| T = line([(0,0), (3,0), (3,4), (0,0)],rgbcolor='black',thickness=2) lbl = text("3",(1.5,-.5),fontsize=28) + text("4",(3.2,1.5),fontsize=28) lbl += text("5",(1.5,2.5),fontsize=28) lbl += text("Area $n = 6$", (2.1,1.2), fontsize=28, rgbcolor='red') show(T+lbl, axes=False) /// }}} {{{id=40| /// }}} {{{id=3| /// }}}Theorem: A proof of the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture would also solve the congruent number problem.
Proof: Suppose $n$ is a positive integer. Consider the cubic curve $y^2 = x^3 - n^2 x$. Using algebra, one sees that this cubic curve has infinitely many rational points if and only if there are rationals $a,b,c$ such that $n=ab/2$ and $a^2 + b^2 = c^2$. The Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture gives an algorithm to decide whether or not any cubic curve has infinitely many solutions.
Let $E$ be an elliptic curve. For each prime number $p$, let $N_p=\#E(\mathbf{F}_p)$ be the number of solutions modulo $p$.
Definition: Let $a_p = p+1-N_p$.
Theorem (Hasse): $|a_p| < 2\sqrt{p}$.
Let $\Delta = -16(4a^3+27b^2)$. We have the following very deep theorem:
Theorem (Breuil, Conrad, Diamond, Taylor, Wiles -- 1999): The function $$L^*(E,s) = \prod_{{\rm primes\, } p\nmid \Delta}\left(\frac{1}{1-a_p p^{-s} + p^{1-2s}}\right)$ extends (uniquely) to an entire complex-analytic function on the complex plane $\mathbf{C}$.
NOTE: In practice, one usually works with a slightly more complicated function $L(E,s)$. When $\Delta$ is "minimal", this function is $$L(E,s) = L^*(E,s) \cdot \prod_{{\rm primes\, } p\mid \Delta}\left(\frac{1}{1-a_p p^{-s}}\right),$$ where $a_p=p+1-\#E_{ns}(\mathbf{F}_p)$ and $\#E_{ns}(\mathbf{F}_p)$ is the subgroup of nonsingular points.
{{{id=128| # My favoriate elliptic curve: y*(y+1) = x*(x-1)*(x+2) E = EllipticCurve([0,1,1,-2,0]); E /// Elliptic Curve defined by y^2 + y = x^3 + x^2 - 2*x over Rational Field }}} {{{id=125| L = E.lseries(); L /// Complex L-series of the Elliptic Curve defined by y^2 + y = x^3 + x^2 - 2*x over Rational Field }}} {{{id=126| L(2) /// 0.360092863578881 }}} {{{id=127| L(1+I) /// -0.638409938588039 + 0.715495239204667*I }}} {{{id=83| time show(line([(i,L(i)) for i in [-1,-.95,..,2]]), figsize=[7,1.5], ymin=-1) ///Heuristic Observation: If $E$ has infinitely many rational points, then the numbers $N_p$ will tend to be "large", since you can reduce all those points modulo $p$. Since $$L(E,1) "=" \prod_p \frac{p}{N_p} \qquad {\rm (not\, really\, true)},$$ the number $L(E,1)$ will tend to be small.
Theorem (Mordell): There is a finite set $P_1, \ldots, P_r$ of rational points on $E$ so that all rational points (modulo points of finite order) can be generated from these using the group law.
We call the smallest $r$ in Mordell's theorem the rank of $E$.
Conjecture (Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer): $$\text{ord}_{s=1} L(E,s) = \text{rank}(E)$$
This problem, exactly as stated above, is the Clay Math Institute Million Dollar prize problem in algebraic number theory. Its solution would also resolve the 1000-year old congruent number problem.
{{{id=34| /// }}} {{{id=33| /// }}}Theorem: If $\text{ord}_{s=1} L(E,s) \leq 1$ then the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture is true for $E$.
The proof involves Heegner points, modular curves, Euler systems and Galois cohomology.
Open Problem: Show that the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture holds for any specific curve with $r=4$ (or higher). For example, for the curve $$y^2 + xy = x^3 - x^2 - 79x + 289.$$
{{{id=50| E = EllipticCurve([1,-1,0,-79,289]) /// }}}The following command does in fact verify with certainty that the rank is $4$:
{{{id=136| E.rank() /// 4 }}} {{{id=138| E.gens() /// [(-9 : 19 : 1), (-8 : 23 : 1), (-7 : 25 : 1), (4 : -7 : 1)] }}}The $L$-series looks like it vanishes to order $4$, but we can't be sure since we get only 0.000000.... It certainly doesn't vanish to order greater than $4$.
{{{id=30| E.lseries().taylor_series(1, 53, 6) /// 5.54631009473167e-24 + (-2.08951550639391e-23)*z + (-4.15704192504384e-22)*z^2 + (1.66720224204167e-21)*z^3 + 8.94384739590089*z^4 - 33.6950287693207*z^5 + O(z^6) }}} {{{id=140| /// }}} {{{id=139| /// }}}
John Coates (2002): "The ancient union between theory and computation is as potent a force as ever today. It is my strong personal view that the best computations on elliptic curves are those that lead to new insights for attacking the unsolved theoretical problems. Equally, I firmly believe that no abstract theorem about the arithmetic of elliptic curves is worth its salt unless illuminating numerical examples of it can be given." |
{{{id=54| /// }}} {{{id=37| /// }}}