Recall from Definition 2.1.17 that the Euler
 -function is
-function is
 and
 and  
 is injective.  If
 is injective.  If 
 , then
, then
 and
 and 
 , so
, so 
 because
 because 
 .
Thus
.
Thus  as elements of
 as elements of 
 .
.
Next we show that  is surjective, i.e., that
every element of
 is surjective, i.e., that
every element of 
 is of the
form
 is of the
form  for some
 for some  . Given
. Given  and
 and  with
 with 
 and
 and
 , Theorem 2.2.2 implies that there
exists
, Theorem 2.2.2 implies that there
exists  with
 with 
 and
 and 
 .  We
may assume that
.  We
may assume that 
 , and since
, and since 
 and
 and
 , we must have
, we must have 
 . Thus
. Thus 
 .
.
  
 of Lemma 2.2.6 is a bijection, so the
  set on the left in (2.2.1) has the same size as the
  product set on the right in (2.2.1).  Thus
 of Lemma 2.2.6 is a bijection, so the
  set on the left in (2.2.1) has the same size as the
  product set on the right in (2.2.1).  Thus
  
 
 
The proposition is helpful in computing 
 , at least
if we assume we can compute the factorization of
, at least
if we assume we can compute the factorization of  (see
Section 3.3.1 for a connection between factoring
 (see
Section 3.3.1 for a connection between factoring  and computing
and computing 
 ).
For example,
).
For example,
 
Also, for
 , we have
, we have
 is the number of numbers less than
 is the number of numbers less than  minus the number of those that are divisible by
minus the number of those that are divisible by  .
Thus, e.g.,
.
Thus, e.g.,
 
William 2007-06-01